Brand and Entity Architecture

Entity Relationship Mapping

Explicitly defining and marking up how your brand entity relates to other entities in your ecosystem.

Extended definition

Entity Relationship Mapping documents and structures the connections between your brand and related entities: competitors (similarTo, competitorOf), partners (partnerOf, collaboratesWith), technologies (usesTechnology, integratesWith), customers (serves, customersInclude), people (founder, leadership, employees), locations (headquarteredIn, operatesIn), and concepts (specializes in, providesServiceType). Mapping creates explicit relationship graphs that AI can traverse to understand positioning and context. Implementation uses schema markup, structured content, knowledge graph assertions, and consistent relationship mentions. Maps should be comprehensive, accurate, and maintained as relationships evolve.

Why this matters for AI search visibility

AI engines understand entities largely through their relationships. Without explicit mapping, AI infers relationships—often incorrectly. Relationship mapping ensures AI knows who your competitors are (not just similar companies), which technologies you actually integrate (not assumed compatibility), what markets you serve (not generic categorization). Explicit relationships improve contextual positioning: when someone asks about Competitor X, AI knows to mention you as an alternative. For complex B2B positioning, relationship mapping communicates nuanced market position that's otherwise lost. Mapped relationships also improve retrieval: AI finds you when searching for entities you're related to.

Practical examples

  • Comprehensive relationship mapping causes 3.4x increase in 'mentioned as alternative' scenarios when prospects research competitors
  • Explicit technology integration relationships (via schema markup) trigger AI citations in 68% of integration queries versus 9% before mapping
  • Customer entity relationships enable AI to accurately describe target market (SMB SaaS companies) instead of generic categorization (businesses)